Subjective mental workload in Spanish emergency nurses. A study on predictive factors.

INTRODUCTION: Mental workload refers to the cognitive or intellectual requirements that a worker is subjected to in a workday. The objective of the present work was to discover the subjective mental workload of nursing staff at Hospital Emergency Units, and its relationship with sociodemographic, work, environmental factors at the workplace, and personality variables. METHOD: A quantitative, descriptive, observational, and crosssectional study was conducted with 201 emergency nurses from 13 different provinces in Spain. Each participant completed 5 questionnaires (sociodemographic, work conditions, environmental conditions, personality, and subjective mental workload). Descriptive statistics were obtained, and Pearson's correlations and multivariate models (multiple linear regression) were performed. RESULTS: The nurses had medium to high levels of mental workload. The environmental conditions had a direct relationship with the mental workload, especially with respect to noise and lighting. The participants obtained high scores in kindness, responsibility, openness/intellect, and extraversion. Positive and statistically significant relations were found between neuroticism and mental workload. Being female, older, and having stable employment or a permanent contract were associated with a greater mental workload of emergency nurses. CONCLUSION: The domain of neuroticism personality, and the hygienic conditions in the workplace were the predictors with the most weight in the model. This study could be useful for defining aspects that need to be considered for the well-being of emergency nurses, such as lighting conditions or environmental noise in the workplace. It also invites reflection on the influence of personal factors (age, gender, personality) and work factors (type of contract, professional experience) on the mental workload of emergency nurses.

What do I take home after the simulation? The importance of emergent learning outcomes in clinical simulation.

BACKGROUND: Clinical simulation learning includes a debriefing after the simulated experience. Debriefing consists of several stages. In this work we focus on the last stage (summary or transfer phase), in which the participants present the most relevant of what they learned during the session. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the perception of 4th year Nursing Degree students on the most significant aspects they learned during the simulation sessions. METHOD: A qualitative, cross-sectional and descriptive study was conducted, with students in their last year of the Nursing Degree at the Catholic University of Murcia. The opinions of 67 students from 5 groups, on the debriefing phase, were analyzed, by comparing them with the objectives that were initially proposed during the design of the scenarios used in the simulations. RESULTS: A total of 78 clinical scenarios were analyzed, with 292 pre-established learning objectives, on a total sample of 67 students. The participants provided a total of 464 learning outcomes that were significant for them, of which 101 coincided with those that were initially planned (21.8%), while the rest, 363 (78.2%), were considered emergent (not planned a priori). For the most part, the learning outcomes described by the students were technical knowledge and/or skills (70.5%), as compared to non-technical knowledge and/or skills (29.5%). CONCLUSION: For the most part, the learning outcomes considered by the students to be significant did not correspond with the objectives set a priori in the design of the scenarios. Most were emergent elements, especially those that referred to the technical knowledge and skills. The emergent knowledge must be considered crucial by the educators for the teaching and training of students.

Training with High Fidelity Simulation in the Care of Patients with Coronavirus-A Learning Experience in Native Health Care Multi-Professional Teams.

The training of emergency and intensive care teams in technical and non-technical skills is fundamental. The general aim of this study was to evaluate the training of various professional teams with simulations based on the care of COVID-19 patients using Zone 3 simulations (native emergency medical services and intensive care units-ICU teams) in the Region of Murcia (Spain). A mixed pilot study was designed (qualitative/quantitative) comprised of three phases: Phase 1: detection of needs (focus groups), Phase 2: design of simulation scenarios, and Phase 3: training with high-fidelity simulation and evaluation of competences. The results were used to determine the real training needs of these health professionals, which were used to design four simulation scenarios in line with these needs. The team competences were evaluated before and after the training session, with increases observed after the training sessions, especially in non-technical skills such as communication. Training with zone 3 simulation, with multi-professional native emergency and intensive care teams who provided care to patients with coronavirus was shown to be an effective method, especially for training in non-technical skills. We should consider the training needs of the professionals before the start of any training program to stay one-step ahead of crisis situations.